home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: bristlecone.together.net!usenet
- From: krw@together.net
- Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
- Subject: Re: Why 33600?
- Date: 16 Apr 1996 01:39:31 GMT
- Organization: TGF Internet Services
- Message-ID: <4kutoj$quc@bristlecone.together.net>
- References: <4kn9v9$n6e@solaris.cc.vt.edu> <4kok44$mj9@hg.oro.net> <3171de07.5184018@news.pbinet.com>
- Reply-To: krw@together.net
- NNTP-Posting-Host: vtr136.ramp.together.net
- X-Newsreader: IBM NewsReader/2 v1.2
-
- In <3171de07.5184018@news.pbinet.com>, JNavas@NavasGrp.com (John Navas) writes:
- ;>> Not really! If people would start demanding (and using) 'cached serial
- ;>>ports' they would discover even 14.4's are much faster than they realize. To
- ;>>me this increasing of the Analog Rate is a marketing ploy.
- ;>
- ;>
- ;>No offense, but that's nonsense.
- ;>
- I'll climb on this one. Why bother with offense, when the other speaks
- nonsense. It would be usefull for people to learn about technology, but
- until they do they will get garbage like this, and RPI modems.
-
- /----------------------------------------------------------
- / Keith R. Williams
- / krw@together.net
- / Burlington Vermont
-
-